Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘nafta’

Canada news broadcast (CTV) reveals MSNBC report.

A senior member of the Obama campaign called the Canadian government within the last month to say,

“When Senator Obama talks about opting out of the free-trade deal, the Canadian government shouldn’t worry.” The operative said, “it’s just campaign rhetoric” and “don’t take it seriously.”

Barack Obama has lied about being against NAFTA. It was just “campaign rhetoric”.

‘The Obama Show’ is based on using the buzzword “change” and the “yes we can” motto, a message of “hope”, and lots and lots of slow-moving, well-spoken rhetoric to get a crowd cheering him on.

But there’s no clear understanding of what, how, or if he even has enough experience (only four years) to run this country or solve its giant problems.

There’s not much more you need to know – he’s for “Change”.

Just words? Barack lies to Ohio about NAFTA:

The truth is, he does support NAFTA and the formation of an open-borders North American Union. That’s why he has been given millions of dollars to fund his campaign from the Fortune 500 corporations – the ones who are also part of the Council on Foreign Relations. And to help verify this association: his wife is an official member of the CFR.

NAFTA: Ten Years of Broken Promises:

Is Canada or Mexico going to be happy about this? Not a chance!

Why did Obama lie?

To avoid the already concealed issue of the NAU.

Bush Forms N. American Union with Mexico:

You weren’t supposed to know. They didn’t want you or the Congress to vote on it.

Three men: abolish our constitutions and write a new one together.

This was originally meant to happen in 2010.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »


The North American Union – You Could Be Voting Your Rights Away

NaturalNews.com
by Barbara L. Minton

One issue that is conspicuously absent from the rhetoric of the presidential candidates is the North American Union (NAU).NAFTA - NAU The questions of immigration and border security are frequently raised and the candidates claim to realize the need for a clear immigration policy and effort to secure the borders of the United States. Yet when you begin to understand the purposes of the North American Union and the agenda of its proponents, you will understand why this will never happen. And you may also begin to see that you are being manipulated by the major candidates.

The NAU, a goal of the Council on Foreign Relations [in which Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and most other candidates are members], follows a plan laid out by Robert Pastor. It is currently promoted by the Bush administration to expand the size and scope of NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement). Its goal is to effectively create a North American trading block by erasing the borders between the U.S., Mexico and Canada resulting in free, unimpeded movement of people and goods across those borders. It is also a political union that would integrate the governments of the three countries. And clearly it is an economic union with the intention of equalizing the wages and standard of living of all but the ruling elitists.

Sounds a lot like the European Union, doesn’t it? There are even plans for a common currency called the amero. But there is one glaring difference. The people of the United States have never been asked if they want to become integrated with Mexico and Canada, two countries of enormously different laws, culture, economic systems, standards of living, and acceptance of the role of government.

The European Union followed years of open debate at all levels, intense coverage of the ramifications and implications in major media, and a vote of the people.

Also called for is the replacing of all three branches of the US government with a North American version effectively ending U.S. representative government.

The creation of this agreement was never submitted to Congress for discussion or decision.

In October 2006, Congressman Paul formally denounced the formation of the SPP and the plans for the North American Union and the SPP as “an unholy alliance of foreign consortiums and officials from several governments”. Paul says that the real issue raised by the SPP is nation sovereignty. “Once again, decisions that affect millions of Americans are not being made by those Americans themselves, or even by their elected representatives in Congress. Instead, a handful of elites use their government connections to bypass national legislatures and ignore our Constitution – which expressly grants Congress the sole authority to regulate international trade.” In this speech Paul predicts that the NAU will become a sleeper issue for the 2008 election, stating that “any movement toward a NAU diminishes the ability of average Americans to influence the laws under which they must live.”

Please read the rest of this very important article.

Read Full Post »