Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘World Government’ Category

In the 70s, this film was produced by G. Edward Griffin to announce the very issues that a movement of people are finally waking-up to today. Is this perhaps the first documentary made to expose the underlying powers of governments?

Some will automatically wish to dismiss these statements as fact, but to have any desire to seek the truth would surely allow one to have an open mind. The greatest conspiracy may be – the conspiracy to make you laugh at the idea of ‘conspiracy’. Free your mind.

Full video (Google)
Playlist (YouTube)
Download (windows media, 49 MB – 47 minutes)

Conclusion:

1) There is an has been, for some time, a conspiracy among some of the richest people in the world – a conspiracy that virtually owns the money systems of the major, non-communist nations. This monopoly is protected by the power of the respected governments, and is used to perpetuate the conspiracy’ vast wealth, by the creation of money out of nothing.

2) In the United States, this monetary fraud is perpetuated though the Federal Reserve System. Although the executive branch theoretically has some control over this system though occasional appointments, in reality, it is this system and those behind it who control the executive branch.

3) The capitalist conspiracy, in this country, surfaces to public view in the form of the semi-secret Council on Foreign Relations. It’s members exercise their control over the nation through government, tax-exempt foundations, centers of education, and the mass-communications media.

4) On the surface, the capitalist conspiracy appears to oppose communism. It spends billions of dollars on spectacular military displays of anti-communism all around the world. But never to the extent of seriously harming the enemy, and certainly not to the extent of defeating it. Meanwhile, behind the scenes, the conspiracy always has nourished and aided communism, both at home and abroad. It does this, not because it is pro-communist, but because it needs the appearance of a formidable foe, and the chaos by-product of a managed conflict, to advance its own goal of totalitarian world government.

5) There is much evidence indicating that the capitalist and communist conspiracies both are directed by a single, master-conspiracy which may have continuity with the Order of the Illuminati, which was founded [240] years ago. But this historical question is not nearly as important as the immediate question of what can be done about it today.

6) As for our response, we must begin to dismantle the conspiracy’s machine of big-government. We must restore American independence. We must return our schools to local control. We must protect our police forces from federal aid, which is a certain path to a national police force controlled from Washington. We must denounce revenue sharing as a transparent device leading to control over local government. We must raise-up men for political office who not only talk about reducing government, but who will do it once elected. And that means men who are totally independent of establishment politics.

7) We must reduce the Federal Reserve System to a service function of clearing checks between banks only. Merely turning the system as it stands over to the Federal Government, as some have suggested, will not solve the problem. The same people would control it either way. The root of the evil is that money is created out of nothing, and the insiders could to that today just as easily directly through government, as they do through the Federal Reserve System. The ultimate solution is to prevent anyone, in or out of government, from manipulating the money supply. And the only way to do that, is to return our money to the gold and silver standards.

8) We must expose conspiracy to public view. If somehow, every American could be made aware of the facts contained in this presentation. If it were possible to circumvent the establishments channels of mass-communication and carry this message person-to-person to our friends and neighbors and fellow club members, the conspiracy would collapse – like a house of cards.

G. Edward Griffin – Ron Paul vs NWO Establishment

Read Full Post »

Have you peed your pants yet?

North American Army created without OK by Congress
U.S., Canada military ink deal to fight domestic emergencies
Posted: February 24, 2008

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

In a ceremony that received virtually no attention in the American media, the United States and Canada signed a military agreement Feb. 14 allowing the armed forces from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a domestic civil emergency, even one that does not involve a cross-border crisis.

The agreement, defined as a Civil Assistance Plan, was not submitted to Congress for approval, nor did Congress pass any law or treaty specifically authorizing this military agreement to combine the operations of the armed forces of the United States and Canada in the event of a wide range of domestic civil disturbances ranging from violent storms, to health epidemics, to civil riots or terrorist attacks.

READ FULL

Read Full Post »

This article can be read on the CFR website, here. It can also be read on this page, in full, and explained.

Please watch the videos below, and continue to learn about this outstanding treat to American sovereignty.

Sovereignty and globalisation
Author: Richard N. Haass, President, Council on Foreign Relations
February 17, 2006
Project SyndicatePublic enemy

The world’s 190-plus states now co-exist with a larger number of powerful non-sovereign and at least partly (and often largely) independent actors, ranging from corporations to non-government organisations (NGOs), from terrorist groups to drug cartels, from regional and global institutions to banks and private equity funds.

Let me translate: There are over 190 countries in the world, they “co-exist” (are in partnership) with “independent actors” such as terrorists and drug cartels, institutions (regional and global), banks and bankers. They even have an acronym for them, the “NGOs“.

The sovereign state is influenced by them (for better and for worse) as much as it is able to influence them. The near monopoly of power once enjoyed by sovereign entities is being eroded.

He says: Terrorists, drug lords, bankers, etc. have control over these many countries of the world (which isn’t entirely a bad thing). “Sovereignty… is being eroded.”

As a result, new mechanisms are needed for regional and global governance that include actors other than states.

In other words, new mechanisms – not the states – are needed to govern the world.

This is not to argue that Microsoft, Amnesty International, or Goldman Sachs be given seats in the United Nations General Assembly, but it does mean including representatives of such organisations in regional and global deliberations when they have the capacity to affect whether and how regional and global challenges are met.

The corporations that are members of the CFR should be the representatives of the world government.

Moreover, states must be prepared to cede some sovereignty to world bodies if the international system is to function.

States will have to give-up their sovereignty and become subject to the new world order.

This is already taking place in the trade realm.

The new world order agenda has already begun.

Governments agree to accept the rulings of the World Trade Organisation because on balance they benefit from an international trading order, even if a particular decision requires that they alter a practice that is their sovereign right to carry out.

Governments will prefer to give-up their sovereign rights to the order of the WTO.

Some governments are prepared to give up elements of sovereignty to address the threat of global climate change.

Global climate change is being used as a “threat” to get governments to concede their sovereignty.

Under one such arrangement, the Kyoto Protocol, which runs through 2012, signatories agree to cap specific emissions. What is needed now is a successor arrangement in which a larger number of governments, including the United States, China and India, accept emission limits or adopt common standards because they recognise that they would be worse off if no country did.

The Kyoto Protocol was a success, now a successor is needed to get more and larger governments “adopt common standards”.

All of this suggests that sovereignty must be redefined if states are to cope with globalisation.

Globalization is the end to sovereignty as we know it.

At its core, globalisation entails the increasing volume, velocity and importance of flows within and across borders of people, ideas, greenhouse gases, goods, dollars, drugs, viruses, emails, weapons, and a good deal else, challenging one of sovereignty’s fundamental principles: the ability to control what crosses borders in either direction.

Eliminating borders, globalization increases the flows of everything (including viruses, weapons, pollution, drugs…); contrary to the principals of sovereignty.

Sovereign states increasingly measure their vulnerability not to one another, but to forces beyond their control.

Sovereign states fear “forces beyond their control”.

Globalisation thus implies that sovereignty is not only becoming weaker in reality, but that it needs to become weaker.

Globalisation destroys sovereignty.

States would be wise to weaken sovereignty in order to protect themselves, because they cannot insulate themselves from what goes on elsewhere. Sovereignty is no longer a sanctuary.

“Forces beyond their control” will destroy the sovereignty of states; they cannot defend themselves from globalization.

This was demonstrated by the American and world reaction to terrorism. Afghanistan’s Taliban government, which provided access and support to al-Qaeda, was removed from power.

The fear of terrorism can be used to overthrow government.

Similarly, America’s preventive war against an Iraq that ignored the UN and was thought to possess weapons of mass destruction showed that sovereignty no longer provides absolute protection.

Iraq showed how a sovereign can be targeted against based only on presumptive (or false) evidence.

Imagine how the world would react if some government were known to be planning to use or transfer a nuclear device or had already done so. Many would argue correctly that sovereignty provides no protection for that state.

If a government is accused of having intention to use a nuclear device, nothing could protect them.

Necessity may also lead to reducing or even eliminating sovereignty when a government, whether from a lack of capacity or conscious policy, is unable to provide for the basic needs of its citizens. This reflects not simply scruples, but a view that state failure and genocide can lead to destabilising refugee flows and create openings for terrorists to take root.

The ‘war on terror‘ can use the excuse of government scruples to eliminate a state’s sovereignty.

The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation’s intervention in Kosovo was an example where a number of governments chose to violate the sovereignty of another government (Serbia) to stop ethnic cleansing and genocide. By contrast, the mass killing in Rwanda a decade ago and now in Darfur, Sudan, demonstrate the high price of judging sovereignty to be supreme and thus doing little to prevent the slaughter of innocents.

NATO is an example of violating a sovereign state under the excuse of genocide and mass killing.

Our notion of sovereignty must therefore be conditional, even contractual, rather than absolute. If a state fails to live up to its side of the bargain by sponsoring terrorism, either transferring or using weapons of mass destruction, or conducting genocide, then it forfeits the normal benefits of sovereignty and opens itself up to attack, removal or occupation. The diplomatic challenge for this era is to gain widespread support for principles of state conduct and a procedure for determining remedies when these principles are violated.

Sovereignties must agree to principals against terrorism, WMDs, and genocide, or they will be open to attack, and remedied, [by another government].

The goal should be to redefine sovereignty for the era of globalisation, to find a balance between a world of fully sovereign states and an international system of either world government or anarchy.

Sovereignty must be redefined for “the era of globalization”; to be better suited to an international system of world government.

The basic idea of sovereignty, which still provides a useful constraint on violence between states, needs to be preserved. But the concept needs to be adapted to a world in which the main challenges to order come from what global forces do to states and what governments do to their citizens, rather than from what states do to one another.

The main challenges to Order are between global forces and states, not between states.

Read Full Post »

Watch the video responses. Show to everyone you know!

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

The Real News.com

From Kosovo to Kurdistan
Pepe Escobar: It’s about oil and US military bases (Part one)
Monday March 3rd, 2008

Read Full Post »

Part 1: The Great Seal

Historic Fact: Many esoteric organizations have existed for centuries, of which many have had tremendous influence and (sometimes violent and sinful) impact over the institutions and societies of nations and people across the world. Fascists, ‘communists’, terrorists, and evil dictators are not only a thing of the past.

This article is about the United States federal government and its lesser-known history with secret societies. For generations – since the Foundation – secret societies have had tremendous influence upon the American government… but by whom and for what purpose?

One piece of evidence is the Great Seal of the United States. This is just one classic example of how iconography and symbolism have been used to preserve the history of America. In the case of the US Seal we can see how the country gets some of its heritage from secret societies.

United States seal Great seal of the US-Reverse

Notice: on the front of the Seal, the sun is eclipsed by thirteen stars and surrounded by a ring of clouds. On the reverse of the seal, the sun is eclipsed with the eye of providence – also known as the ‘all-seeing eye’ or the sun of reason (see below). There are many other features here, but these parts in particular suggest the connection between two societies with the United States.

The Great Seal wasn’t approved by Congress until 1782. The drafts were made by Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams. Their designs were merged by the Congress – to include the Eye of Providence, the date of independence, the shield, and the “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of Many, one) motto.

The Eye is an icon that dates as far back as Ancient Egyptian culture, but was more recently adopted by the Freemasons sometime in the 1600s. Appearing on the reverse of seal, the Eye (freemasonry) represents its position at the top of a solid and lasting foundation. Many of the Founding Fathers were members of or had some affiliations with Freemasonry, including Franklin, Jefferson and Adams. This history with the Masons is not especially secretive…

But there’s another man – though unmentioned in the history of the Great Seal – who’s society seems to have imposed some particular influence over some of the final design:

Part 2: Adam Weishaupt’s Illuminati

A summary of Adam Weishaupt‘s history begins with his revolt against his Jesuit upbringings in exchange for the movement of free thought (the Enlightenment). Preferring deism and a universal system, he eventually founded the movement of the Illuminati at age 28, in Bavaria (Germany). Founded on May 1, 1776 – two months before the American Declaration of Independence – his secret society spread like wildfire across Europe, eventually reaching the United States – without Weishaupt even being there.

“I am proud to be known to the world as the founder of the Illuminati.” – Adam Weishaupt

Adam Weishaupt - Founder of the Illuminati

Weishaupt, while still newly expanding his ‘theories of illumination’, was initiated into the Freemason Lodge in 1777. His new concept for the Illuminati was based on the idea of:

“illumination, enlightening the understanding by the sun of reason, which will dispel the clouds of superstition and of prejudice.”

He also said,

“We see with what keenness and zeal the frivolous business of Freemasons is conducted, by persons knit together by the secrecy of their union.” (more Weishaupt quotes)

The former statement reflects strongly upon the images on the Great Seal.

Weishaupt seemed to have a great appreciation for symbols, as he also said, “Every man is entitled therefore, to give any explanation of the symbols and a system of the doctrine that he can render palatable.”

Illuminati: the orphan of Freemasonry(?)

It is no secret that the founders on the United States were Masons. We also know that the Illuminati are a society that grew within Freemasonry. It is known that the Masons designed the Great Seal – as is seen in the original drafts; and it is also evident that symbolism was used here be the Congress to designate the presence of the Illuminati as well.

But the philosophy of the Masons and the Illuminati had their differences. For being geared upon gnosticism and the goal of “perfecting human” nature, the abolition of government and religion, and the apparent belief that they should rule the world – the Illuminati was rejected from Freemasonry Lodges (publicly at least; some believe that Weishaupt and the Illuminati were an intended secret by the Masonic-elite).

Another message on the Great Seal reflects their common, yet different, goals. The message “Novus Ordo Seclorum” was added by members of the Congress when approving the original (Masonic) drafts. It means “New Order of the Ages”. Perhaps to the Masons the United States was their ‘new order’, but the the Illuminati – the U.S. was to be only a stepping stone towards an eventual ‘new world order’.

Proofs of a Conspiracy Against All the Religions and Governments of Europe
By John Robison

Weishaupt had long been scheming the establishment of an Association or Order, which, in time, should govern the world.

Several associated Lodges were the nursery or preparation-school for another Order of Masons, who called themselves the Illuminated, and that the express aim of this Order was to abolish Christianity, and overturn all civil government. …members of the Lodge Theodore had unguardedly spoke of this Order as one that must in time rule the world.

The Illuminati have covered-up their zeal with the message of bringing happiness to humankind. Who wouldn’t think that a world unified would be an ideal and noble world? And so Weishaupt said, “Let this circumstance of our constitution therefore be directed to this noble purpose, and then all the objections urged against it by jealous tyranny and affrighted superstition will vanish.”

(Also, looking at the Statue of Liberty, see this page on the Weishaupt quote: “G is Grace, the Flaming Star is the Torch of Reason. Those who possess this knowledge are indeed Illuminati.”)

Part 3: The New World Order

In the past century, America has become the most elite and powerful country in the world. The United States government has established military bases in 130 countries, having some 700 bases around the world. America’s military empire has most recently revealed very strong intentions to work towards the establishment of a “New World Order”, starting with what’s being called the North American Union. What are the intentions?

“And of all illumination which human reason can give, none is comparable to the discovery of what we are, our nature, our obligations, what happiness we are capable of, and what are the means of attaining it.”

“In another situation, and in an active station in life, I should have been keenly occupied, and the founding of an order would have never come into my head. – Adam Weishaupt

Weishaupt and the Illuminati had five main goals by which to obtain their vision (quotes from Weishaupt):

  • Abolition of all religion
    • “Oh mortal man, is there anything you cannot be made to believe?”
    • “But alas, they are all sadly deficient, because they leave us under the domination of political and religious prejudices; and they are as inefficient as the sleepy dose of an ordinary sermon.
  • Abolition of patriotism/nationalism
    • The human race will then become one family, and the world will be the dwelling of Rational Men.
  • Abolition of private property
  • Abolition of all ordered governments
    • When man lives under government, he is fallen, his worth is gone, and his nature tarnished.”
  • Abolition of the family (in exchange for communal/state education of children)
    • “The first task of the association must therefore be to form the young members.”
    • The hankering of the mind is irresistible.
    • “It was the full conviction of this, and of what could be done, if every man were placed in the office for which he was fitted by nature and a proper education, which first suggested to me the plan of Illumination.”

Plato

Their new order would not be controlled by the people, but would instead be dictated by an elite group (in other words – pure Fascism).

This form of government is essentially based on ideas from The Republic of Plato, and the Illuminati’s philosophy – to achieve a ‘perfect’ society – was recently reignited by Leo Strauss (see below).

In this hypothetical, political society, (to put it simply) there are ultimately three classes of people (which are theoretically simplified to gold, silver, and bronze). The ‘gold’ class would consist of the most elite – a small part of the population who are ‘fit to rule’. According to Plato, this class is known as the ‘philosopher-kings‘. The ‘qualification’ to belong to this class is the element of Reason (logos).

“The head of every family will be what Abraham was, the patriarch, the priest and the unlettered lord of his family, and Reason will be the code of laws to all mankind.” – Adam Weishaupt

The ‘silver’ and ‘bronze’ classes are subject to the ‘reasoning’ of the elites. Silver is equated to the status of the military class (which Plato named “guardians”) – men or women – who share the duty to basically moderate between the interdependent gold and bronze class and enforce the will of the elite. The Bronze class consists of the majority of the population (average citizens) who are the “workers” (basically, the economic class of producers and consumers) who’s duty it is to produce a surplus to sustain the ‘kings’ and the ‘guardians’ – to keep the system functioning.

Plato is known to be the father of politics – his ideas have influenced virtually the entire political outcome of history since his time and his work has been widely, and highly regarded. However, never before has his Republic been seen in action, and one must ask, is it possible to achieve and could it work?

The NWO conspiracy wants to bring it – or a form of it – into reality. But if anything is certain: it’s that such course of action wages war against the free, and transforming the world inflicts inevitable and detrimental consequences to the majority. Communism and fascism have demonstrated the effects in recent history – the consequences are inevitable and expected.

Reminiscent of some of the discussion in The Republic, Weishaupt had also said:

“Sin is only that which is hurtful, and if the profit is greater than the damage, it becomes a virtue.”

If sin can become a virtue, then you have the right to do anything you want so long as the ends justify the means (according to Weishaupt, not Plato). This is somewhat reminiscent of the fascism of the Nazi party. This situation in America carries the possible threat of civil war and a very similar situation to the Holocaust. Essentially, this is what aware Americans are afraid of most.

Part 4: Neo-Conservatism

“Oh mortal man, is there anything you cannot be made to believe?…. Of all the means I know to lead men, the most effectual is a concealed mystery….The hankering of the mind is irresistible.” – Adam WeishauptLeo Strauss

In recent American history there has been the growth of a new movement in the US government called neoconservatism. While there is no outright philosophy of neoconservatism, actions speak louder than words, and the widely-criticized imperial efforts of this movement greatly assimilates the ‘what would be’ intentions of the Illuminati.

The true nature of this movement is revealed in it’s history. One of the founders of this school was a man names Leo Strauss.

Strauss was a professor of political philosophy and had a keen study in early political thought. He shared the same philosophical roots of Illuminati via the philosophy of Plato.

Leo Strauss and the Rhetoric of the War on Terror
By Nicholas Xenos

In July 1933, Strauss wrote a letter to a colleague. In it we learn that Strauss was somebody who wanted to go back to a previous, pre-liberal, pre-bourgeois era of blood and guts, of imperial domination, of authoritarian rule, of pure fascism. What Strauss hated about liberalism, among other things, was its inability to make absolute judgments, its inability to take action. He sought a way out in a kind of pre-liberal decisiveness.

I would suggest that this description of fascist, authoritarian, imperial principles accurately describes the current imperial project of the United States. Because of this, examining the foundational elements of Strauss’s political theory helps us to see something important about our current situation, independently of any kind of Straussian direct influence, although there is certainly some of that.

Straussian and Illuminati ideas came together in the past century, culminating into the neoconservative. Claes G. Ryn (Professor of Politics at The Catholic University of America) relates neoconservatives to a form of neo-Jacobians, which:

“…regards America as founded on universal principles and assigns to the United States the role of supervising the remaking of the world. Its adherents have the intense dogmatic commitment of true believers and are highly prone to moralistic rhetoric. They demand, among other things, “moral clarity” in dealing with regimes that stand in the way of America’s universal purpose. They see themselves as champions of “virtue.”

Part 5: Conclusion

Via Freemasonry and the Founding Fathers, the Illuminati’s New World Order spread its power and influence through the United States government since the establishment of the country. The history of these societies goes back to ancient times, birthing Masonry, Illuminati, and many other modern societies, and groups of every kind, including the Bilderberg Group, The Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, The U.S. Federal Reserve, and so on. And in addition to this is the influence and power over unions such as the European Union, the United Nations, and of course the United States.

Basically, the world is saturated with monster schemes with a history and objectives that most can hardly even imagine. Stealing elections to put society members in power, conspiring to the 9/11 attack, establishing military dominance in the Middle-East, erasing borders, destroying the US dollar, and undermining of the US Constitution are only the first most evident steps in the final execution of a plan that’s centuries old.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »