Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Election Fraud’ Category

Now that Huckabee is out, they try to create the impression that McCain has officially won the entire nomination process.

But anyone who understands how it really works knows that this is a lie, because there isn’t an official Republican nomination until the GOP national convention in September.

And yes, Ron Paul is still in the race and is not going to quit. He and his supporters are going to prove that the support is far greater than any mainstream media source is allowed to admit.

What’s really going on here continues to become more and more obvious…

PRESUMPTIVE Nominee

Ron Paul won a landslide victory in Texas against his Republican rival for his congressional seat – by over 70% of the vote.

At the same time, apparently, those same voters voted for McCain – and Paul got only 5% of the vote for presidential nomination in his own state?

Anyone who still believes this crap – that McCain is the preferred Republican candidate – must be ready to believe anything the mainstream media wants them to.

The country is not so divided that we vote both for an anti-war liberal and an endless-war neocon at the same time!

And the election is not decided by electronic voting machines!

The vote is rigged folks – it’s possible, it’s proven, and it’s being done – believe it!

How obvious does this situation need to be before people start taking it seriously. Your elections are being manipulated and rigged. Aren’t you angry yet? Will America continue to stare at their television and accept the endless propaganda?

McCain may have ‘won’ his 1191 delegates, but that still does not mean that this is over. Not all of these delegates are pledged, and the GOP convention isn’t until September – there is no official nominee until then.

So any media or other ill-informed person who tells you that McCain is the nominee – is wrong.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

These are some of the recent vote fraud cases, as reported on the Republican National Committee web site. Click here to view all vote fraud cases across the country.

South Carolina– 02.18.08
Eastover’s mayor and police chief are scheduled to go on trial together Tuesday, charged in connection with an election fraud case. The two – suspended mayor Chris Campbell, 41, and Chief Tim Ford, 35 – are charged with conspiring to intimidate witnesses after absentee ballots changed the results of a hotly contested town council race.

Mississippi– 02.16.08
Seven more witnesses took the stand Friday to testify in the court proceedings contesting the Woodville 2007 primary election. The victories of Reginald Jackson, sheriff; Mon Cre Allen, circuit clerk; and Richard Hollins, District 2 Supervisor, have been contested amidst allegations of vote fraud. One witness, Terrance Stanwood, testified that he was given $1 and a hamburger after voting.

Georgia– 02.15.08
The State Election Board fined a Valdosta nursing home employee $1,000 for improperly assisting residents with registering and absentee voting. Courtney Griener, Activities Director at Lakehaven Nursing Home, acknowledged to the board that she had completed voter registration paperwork for two residents and completed absentee ballots for three residents.

Mississippi– 02.15.08
Two sisters, Latosha and Latonia Goodrich, testified under immunity to being complicit in vote fraud during court proceedings contesting the August 2007 Woodville elections. Latosha Goodrich testified that they met with Connie Hollins, sister of District 2 Supervisor Richard Hollins, in a Texaco parking lot for the purpose of filling out absentee ballots. More

California– 02.12.08
Chris Kavanagh, who faces six felony counts for allegedly misrepresenting where he lives, has resigned from his post on the Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board. The criminal charges against Kavanagh are still pending, and he’s due back in Alameda County Superior Court on Feb. 22 for a preliminary hearing.

Indiana– 02.11.08
A Lake County criminal court placed suspended police officer Ponciano Herrera of East Chicago on 90 days probation for vote fraud. Herrera, 42, pled guilty to a reduced misdemeanor charge of acquiring a phony ballot in the 2003 East Chicago Democratic primary election.

Missouri– 02.09.08
Joel L. Neal of St. Louis has been indicted on federal election fraud charges for attempting to cast an absentee ballot in the name of his deceased mother. According to the indictment, Neal’s mother died in October but her name remained on the roll of eligible voters. Neal requested an absentee ballot for his mother in January, claiming she was incapacitated.

Louisiana– 02.09.08
Henrietta M. Williams, who was convicted for vote fraud during the 2004 Ferriday mayoral election, turned herself in to authorities on Friday. Williams, 56, was convicted on charges of filing a false public document after she filled out an absentee ballot under the name Maude Lee Williams.

Read Full Post »

Remember how John McCain claimed that he would stay in Iraq as long as it takes – even 100 years?

So isn’t it odd that of the 44% of Republicans in New Hampshire who voted and disapprove of the war voted for McCain?

Just another good reason to be skeptical of the veracity of the ‘vote’. Either there’s something wrong with the vote or a lot of people don’t know what they’re voting for.

Check it for yourself, here on page 5.

war-in-iraq.gif

This says that 63% of people who voted approve of the War in Iraq and 35% disapprove. Of those who disapprove of the war, 44% voted for McCain.

war-in-iraq-2.gif

This says that (21% + 14%) = 35% of people vote with disapproval of the war, and (49% + 38%) = 87% of those people voted for McCain.

Read Full Post »

Stealing elections is not a joke and not a ‘conspiracy theory’ – it is real! Nor is this something new. The recent advent of the voting machine (used in about 80% of the country, dominated by one corporation that produces them) has allowed elections to be stolen for years. Remember, if stealing votes is possible – it’s inevitable.

Another American election is being stolen. To add to that, the paper-trail can not be relied on for a recount. You vote, Diebold decides.

The ‘official’ 2008 results are already in. It is meant to come down to Obama and McCain in November. McCain is the intended winner of the election – the perfect puppet for special interests that wish to progress Bush’s foreign policy – by attacking Iran.

Evidence shows that elections have been stolen since as early as 2000 – to get (and keep) Bush in the White House in order to forward a progressive foreign policy to promote the destruction of the Constitution and the dollar, military dominance in the Middle East, and the establishment of a new world order.

You can learn more about ‘Hacking Democracy’ by watching this movie (full version here):

Hacking Democracy (part 1 of 9)

Read Full Post »

Dennis Kucinich has been granted his request for the recount of all the votes cast in New Hampshire.

Kucinich will pay for the vote recount, despite not believing that it will help his own ranking in the State. There have been a lot of allegations in NH that votes for certain candidates have not been counted and other concerns about electronic voting.

“One of the biggest issues [nationally] is the integrity of our elections. People want to make sure that every vote counts and is counted. I’m for paper ballots in all Federal elections so we don’t have to deal with this, but if we don’t straighten out this issue now about what happened in New Hampshire… and if it’s nothing, fine – then we’ll know. But if there’s something there, then the American people will know that at least one person made the effort to come to a real accounting. And we better do this because [if it’s] not straightened out in the primary – if no one challenges it – what are we to expect in the general election?”

Part 1:

Part II: watch here.

Many may find it a bit peculiar that Kucinich is concerned about something that won’t necessarily help him in the election. But of course – it must be made clear – that this is about more than him, it’s about the integrity of the election.

Ron Paul decided to not follow Kucinich in this effort.

Without a firm belief that vote fraud had taken place, and without the possibility that a recount would have increased the chances for success of our campaign, a recount would have diverted campaign resources, time, and energy away from crucial battles elsewhere. – Ron Paul

In other words, Paul and his campaign are satisfied that they are on the right track and that their results so far are positive, whether or not the alleged vote fraud is real.

Nevertheless, Kucinich has taken the liberty to fund the recount, which may reveal new results for everyone. The recount will begin on January 16th. The important thing is – if there is found evidence of tampering with the election, it will be very big news and could end the use the the controversial machines in many – if not all – of the States that use them.

If you wish to help with the recount, visit the Granny Warriors and Dennis4President.com

Read Full Post »

After the unbelievable results from New Hampshire, I hope for and expected the evidence of voter fraud to be exposed before too long. Well, here it comes. There’s now being a demand for a vote recount by some candidates and their supporters. This applies not only to Ron Paul, but to Kucinich, Obama and other candidates as well who may have done better than the machines have made it seem. In some places there have been results of zero votes for Ron Paul, causing the voters of those districts to speak out about it. It looks like the voter fraud has outdone itself after all. Revealing this case can have major repercussions on the voting in the other States to come.

Ron Paul Vote Fraud: Sutton, New Hampshire: Part 1:

Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9

Dennis Kucinich has called for a recount of the votes in New Hampshire:

Democratic Presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich, the most outspoken advocate in the Presidential field and in Congress for election integrity, paper-ballot elections, and campaign finance reform, has sent a letter to the New Hampshire Secretary of State asking for a recount of Tuesday’s election because of “unexplained disparities between hand-counted ballots and machine-counted ballots.”

“Serious and credible reports, allegations, and rumors have surfaced in the past few days…It is imperative that these questions be addressed in the interest of public confidence in the integrity of the election process and the election machinery – not just in New Hampshire, but in every other state that conducts a primary election.”

Read Full Post »

How much evidence do we need to start an uprising against these machines? There is absolutely no reason to disbelieve in the possibility of this voter fraud occuring in this election just as well as the two before.

There is only one way to stop it – countable paper ballots!

I also recommend the HBO documentary: Hacking Democracy, which you can see in in-full here on Google video.

HBO: Hacking Democracy trailer

Electronic Voting Machine Fraud:

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

Part 5:

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »