Archive for February, 2008

The following are excerpts of the full article here.

On the 27th of December 2007 the Canna Zine (http://cannazine.co.uk ), a daily cannabis news website based in the UK, was accepted as an accredited Google News source.

It started when my broadband connection was all of a sudden cut off. Phone lines too.

After two days of British Telecom tech support telling me “the fault is a mystery”, I decided to do some of my own detective work.


I would be guessing if I answered, but you only have to read through my material, which is still on Google News, to see why the government, Gordon Brown, and Jacqui Smith specifically, may want to take the Canna Zine “off the air”.

Lies? Untruth’s?

Not a bit of it. We only tell the truth regarding the legal status of cannabis, but perhaps this is the problem?

I decided I needed to do some research and after only a search or two I was shocked at what I found out.

Apparently the Internet we all love and know so well is actually being overseen by the authorities. Every web search, every website we view, every picture file we look at, has been pre-agreed by the government, who says whether we can or can’t look at it.

How does that make you feel? Would you like to complain to your local member of Parliament? You can’t. Would you like that he represents you as the motion is discussed in Parliament? He can’t as there is no discussion. What’s done is done and we have no right of reply.

Back in December, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith wrote some unbelievable new laws.

Laws which received little, or no publicity. Laws which never got to follow the normal pattern of passing through the Houses of Parliament before becoming statute.

Do we trust the government enough to treat these responsibilities with a fair hand? And if we do, can we guarantee that all future governments will treat them with the same responsible attitude?

Is the government going to target only websites involved in distasteful pornography?

It appears not. From evidence I have found out, and witnessed at first hand through the month of January, this new technology also applies to websites guilty of no more than causing the government some irritation or embarrassment.

Why would the UK government want to take a tuppeny website like the Canna Zine off-line? My guess is because we’re publishing news which has never before been allowed.

The UK government has a warm and cosy relationship with the alcohol industry. An industry which contributes literally millions of pounds sterling into the UK economy every single year.

But the truth is out. This relationship causes over 10,000 deaths every year from alcohol related causes and its fair to say if alcohol were invented today, it would not be allowed a licence for sale.

But don’t take my word for it. Check out some of the news which we have published on the Canna Zine recently and make your own mind up.

US Investigators Praise Cannabinoids (marijuana) As Chemo Treatment
Under 18’s encouraged to ‘drink alcohol at home’
Liberal Democrats Appeal to Cannabis Community
Cannabis health argument, smoke and mirrors – Video
Cannabis risk overshadowed by rising alcohol fatalities
Cannabis Is Not The Real Issue In The UK
Cannabis Chronicles – The Reasons Behind Gordon Browns Marijuana Madness
Marijuana replaces Ritalin in treatment for ADD/ADHD – Video
Dutch Police Defend Cannabis Rights
TV Documentary “Dispatches” cannabis theory, shows alcohol as public enemy #1

To read more cannabis news in our unique flavour and style, click HERE.

Read Full Post »

NOTE: This list may not be complete. If you notice something missing, please help (comment below) and I will verify this and add it to the list.The links provided are the references, so you can verify these facts yourself.

Also note, Clinton, McCain, and all the other candidates (excepting Ron Paul) have ties with the CFR as well. (the CFR has been choosing our candidates).

Barack Obama may not an official member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Nevertheless, he and his presidential campaign are incontrovertibly affiliated with and supported by numerous (corporate) CFR members.

His wife, Michelle Obama, is a member of a branch of the CFR in Chicago.

The Obama campaign has taken major contributions from corporate CFR members such as:

JP Morgan Chase & Co – $282,387
Goldman Sachs – $474,428
Lehman Brothers – $274,147
UBS (ag) – $298,180
Citigroup – $247,436
Google – $192,808
Time Warner – $190,091


Obama’s foreign policy adviser, Zbigniew Brzeziński, is a member of the CFR (as well as the Chief Executive Officer on the Trilateral Commission of the Bilderberg group)!

So what’s the problem?

The CFR is a very powerful organization with one goal: to overcome the problem with borders. Under the guise of free-trade, as good as it might sound, it is not just trade – it is to allow trade, uninhibited. Not just the trade, but the exchange of everything. This would ultimately destroy sovereignty, national identity, and our Bill of Rights. The Constitution was designed to restrict the power of government. It is getting in the way of the interests of a small group of elite people who wish to control the world, in order to sustain their immense power and wealth over the nation.

Obama complies, Clinton is a member, McCain is a Manchurian candidate. Ron Paul is the Champion of the Constitution.

WATCH FULL: The Capitalist Conspiracy, by G. Edward Griffith

The Federal Reserve is neither Federal nor a Reserve. Owned by a corrupt group of International Bankers, it is a privately owned monopoly, largely responsible for creating America’s National Debt. It is also a parasitic and unnecessary entity that literally creates American currency out of nothing and then collects interest on the backs of taxpayers for doing so.

Part 1: Corrupt Federal Reserve – Robbing Americans Since 1913

Part 2: CFR – The Secret Government

Part 3: CFR Propaganda – The Media’s Main Stranglehold


1. Illegal IRS: The Unmasked deceptions of the Internal Revenue Service which is privately owned and actually operates out of “Puerto Rico”, with “agents” who represent them in the US (31 Questions and Answers with legal references):

2. Recommended Documentary: “America: From Freedom to Fascism

3. The Shrinking Value of the Dollar:

4. Many homeless Middle Class are living in their cars; from a New York Times article story on the “mobile homeless”:

5. “…that plush North American lifestyle to which we’ve all grown accustomed has been bought on credit, and the bill is rapidly nearing its due date.”

6. “Former World Bank Vice President, Chief Economist and Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz has predicted a global economic crash”

7. “As the US current-account deficit rose over the past half-decade, international economists have lined up to predict doom” – J. Bradford DeLong, Professor of Economics & former Assistant US Treasury Secretary.

8. “The reason we cannot accomplish this seemingly simple task of balancing currency with production is that our government does not exercise its sovereign prerogative of controlling the money supply” –Business Week: by Mark Weisbrot

9. Creating the ‘North American Union’:

The Rothschilds of London and Berlin; Lazard Brothers of Paris; Israel Moses Seif of Italy; Kuhn, Loeb and Warburg of Germany; and the Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs and the Rockefeller families.

Read Full Post »

Obama’s Trillion-Dollar Spending Plan
February 14, 2008

Put it all together, and we are talking about a $200 billion plan, $800 billion over four years. And that does not even include fixing the alternative minimum tax, a $50 billion-a-year item that will assuredly get passed. (Read full article here.)

And where’s the money supposed to come from? Ending the Iraq war, ending Bush’s tax cuts, and raising taxes on the wealthy is not enough.

Read Full Post »

Global Poverty Act: The bill would require the U.S. President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the United Nations Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.

Despite the fact that America is already trillions of dollars in debt, Barack Obama’s so-called policy of ‘change’ will actually make America spend even more.

Where do his supporters think this money is going to come from?

Obama bill: $845 billion more for global poverty
February 14, 2008
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

Sen. Barack Obama, perhaps giving America a preview of priorities he would pursue if elected president, is rejoicing over the Senate committee passage of a plan that could end up costing taxpayers billions of dollars in an attempt to reduce poverty in other nations.

The bill, called the Global Poverty Act, is the type of legislation, “We can – and must – make … a priority,” said Obama, a co-sponsor.It would demand that the president develop “and implement” a policy to “cut extreme global poverty in half by 2015 through aid, trade, debt relief” and other programs.

When word about what appears to be a massive new spending program started getting out, the reaction was immediate. (Read full article here.)

Read Full Post »

Is America’s situation really any different from the rise of fascism in Nazi Germany?

There is a growing darkness in the American government, it is apparent, it is being talked about, and it must be stopped before it stops the people – which could be very soon.

But there is no ‘silver bullet’ candidate. America requires far, far more than the flimsy idea of ‘change’. The problem needs to be solved at its roots.

My personal opinion (Obama supporters, please forgive):

Sadly, although Obama’s supporters have the right heart, they seem to be missing the facts.

By that I mean, it seems they haven’t taken the time to take a very close look at what other’s are saying and what’s really going on. They don’t know much about the history, don’t want to believe that something terrible is happening, and don’t take the time to do the research. I say this because, I used to be an Obama supporter too. But I was patient, took the time to look closely and without bias, and as a result I learned more than I could have ever imagined (the purpose of this blog is to help spread that knowledge).

And I know that there’s another candidate who appeals to the real idea of change that Obama preaches and his supporters thirst for. Ron Paul is the candidate who knows the true reality, and true problems, and how to fight and overcome them. He is not a silver bullet, but he has told us exactly what needs to be done, and his supporters understand that as well – end the problem at its roots.

All I ask of Obama’s supporters is for them to take an unbiased look at Ron Paul: watch his videos, know where he stands.

But above all, if anything… Obama’s supporters must understand what it means when people speak about his membership with the Council on Foreign Relations and what it is. Ron Paul is the only candidate now who is not affiliated with this globalist, corporate and special interest group – and that says a lot!

Read Full Post »

This video is meant to be funny – but it’s also true.

To be come the party’s nominee for president the candidate must win the support of the majority of delegates at that party’s national convention.

The delegates at the national convention vote for the nominee or candidate as determined by the outcomes of the state caucuses and primary elections.

Now the number of convention delegates that vote for these nominees or candidates is divided amongst the states proportionately.

Most of these delegates are pledged to a candidate or nominee who wins the states’ primary or caucus.

But each party and each state has its own guidelines – rewarding these delegates who vote for the candidate or nominee at the national convention.

Some states divide their delegates proportionately, some states like ‘unplaced’ delegates who can vote for any nominee or candidate regardless of the results of the primaries or caucuses.

Counting takes place to determine which democrat candidate or nominee is the person to secure 2183 votes from 4364 delegates – pledged or unpledged at the national convention.

And with republican candidate or nominee it’s the person to secure 1191 delegates, pledged or unpledged to the 2380 elected to the national convention…

…before finally the candidate with the most amount of money is declared president! (This part is just for humor – but it’s basically true anyways.)

Read Full Post »

I wish real news was as accurate as fake news.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »